[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rsync - mehrere Quellargumente?
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: rsync - mehrere Quellargumente?
- From: Werner Holtfreter <Holtfreter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:16:19 +0200
- To: uugrn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Am Montag, 2010-10-25 19:29:47 schrieb Christian Ordig: > schau Dir mal die Beschreibung folgender Optionen an: > --exclude=PATTERN exclude files matching PATTERN > --exclude-from=FILE read exclude patterns from FILE > --include-from=FILE read include patterns from FILE > --files-from=FILE read list of source-file names from FILE Aha, "--include", mir war nicht klar, dass man damit auch ganze Verzeichnisse includieren kann. Dennoch bleibt noch einiges unklar. Ich lese ich in der Manpage: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Note that, when using the --recursive (-r) option (which is implied by -a), every subcomponent of every path is visited from the top down, so include/exclude patterns get applied recursively to each subcomponents full name (e.g. to include /foo/bar/baz the subcomponents /foo and /foo/bar must not be excluded). The exclude patterns actually short-circuit the directory traversal stage when rsync finds the files to send. If a pattern excludes a particular parent directory, it can render a deeper include pattern ineffectual because rsync did not descend through that excluded section of the hierarchy. This is particularly important when using a trailing * rule. For instance, this wont work: CW+ /some/path/this-file-will-not-be-found CW+ /file-is-included CW- * This fails because the parent directory some is excluded by the * rule, so rsync never visits any of the files in the some or some/path directories. One solution is to ask for all directories in the hierarchy to be included by using a single rule: + */ (put it somewhere before the - * rule), and perhaps use the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ --prune-empty-dirs option. Another solution is to add specific include rules for all the parent dirs that need to be visited. For instance, this set of rules works fine: CW+ /some/ CW+ /some/path/ CW+ /some/path/this-file-is-found CW+ /file-also-included CW- * ------------------------------------------------------------------- Die markierten Stelle impliziert, dass die Reihenfolge eine Rolle spielt. Aber wenn dem so ist, dann verstehe ich "this-file-will-not- be-found" im ersten Beispiel nicht, schliesslich wird auch im ersten Beispiel erst inkludiert, dann excludiert. Das wuerde ich gern verstehen um dann z.B. so etwas zu erreichen: "/home/werner/.kde/" excludieren, trotzdem aber "/home/werner/.kde/share/apps/knode/folders/" inkludieren. -- Viele Gruesse Werner Holtfreter -- UUGRN e.V. http://www.uugrn.org/ http://mailman.uugrn.org/mailman/listinfo/uugrn Wiki: https://wiki.uugrn.org/UUGRN:Mailingliste Archiv: http://lists.uugrn.org/